Honor Pledge
What is the University of Maryland Honor Pledge?
The Honor Pledge is a statement undergraduate and graduate students should be asked to write by hand and sign on examinations, papers, or other academic assignments not specifically exempted by the instructor. The Pledge reads:
 |
I pledge on my honor that I have not given or received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment/examination.
|
 |
The pledge was adopted by the University Senate on April 9, 2001, and approved by the President on May 10, 2001. Full implementation is effective throughout the University on the first day of the Spring 2002 semester.
Frequently
Asked Questions about the Honor Pledge
What is
the University of Maryland Honor Pledge?
What are the origins
of the Pledge?
What other colleges and universities use honor pledges?
What is the Maryland Honor Pledge designed to accomplish?
Do
honor pledges suggest students cannot be trusted?
Is there any evidence pledges or public affirmations make a
difference in attitudes or behavior?
How can an honor pledge deter someone who has already decided to
engage in academicdishonesty?
Why are students asked to write the Pledge by hand, as well as to
sign it?
Are honor
pledges burdensome to administer?
What if a student refuses to write or sign the pledge?
How can a pledge be effective if it isn’t compulsory?
What if a faculty member is opposed to administering the pledge?
What kinds of academic exercises should include a Pledge statement?
What should faculty members write about the Pledge in their syllabi?
What should faculty members tell students about University academic
integrity standards, and the Honor Pledge?
1. What
is the University of Maryland Honor Pledge?
The Honor
Pledge is a statement undergraduate and graduate students should
be asked to write by hand and sign on
examinations, papers, or other academic assignments not
specifically exempted by the instructor. The Pledge reads:
I pledge
on my honor that I have not given or received any unauthorized
assistance on this assignment/examination.
The Pledge
was adopted by the University Senate on April 9, 2001, and
approved by the President on May 10, 2001. Full implementation
is effective throughout the University on the first day of the
Spring 2002 semester.
2.
What are the
origins of the Pledge?
The
University of Maryland Honor Pledge was initiated by students.
Hundreds of students signed a campus-wide version of the Pledge
before it was officially adopted by the University Senate. The
Pledge language approved by the Senate was jointly sponsored by
the Student Honor Council and the President's Student Advisory
Council. It was also endorsed by majority vote of the Student
Government Association.
3. What
other colleges and universities use honor pledges?
Students
sign honor pledges on academic assignments at many leading
universities, including Princeton University, The University of
Virginia, the University of North Carolina, Wesleyan University,
Vanderbilt University, Rice University, Oberlin College, and the
University of Michigan (College of Engineering), among others.
Students also sign matriculation honor pledges at institutions
such as Duke University, Georgetown University, and the Medill
School of Journalism at Northwestern University.
4. What
is the Maryland Honor Pledge designed to accomplish?
The Honor
Pledge is a community building ritual, designed to encourage
teachers and students to reflect upon the University’s core
institutional value of academic integrity. Professors who invite
students to sign the Honor Pledge signify that there is an
ethical component to teaching and learning. Students who write
by hand and sign the Pledge affirm a sense of pride in the
integrity of their work.
5. Do
honor pledges suggest students cannot be trusted?
No. student
leaders at Maryland would not have developed the Pledge if it had
that connotation. People who enter a profession or assume public
office often sign an oath or affirmation. Likewise, Maryland
students endorsed the Honor Pledge because they feel a growing sense
of pride in the quality of the University. For them, the Pledge
reflects their public statement of support for academic excellence,
including the highest standards for academic integrity.
6. Is
there any evidence pledges or public affirmations make a difference
in attitudes or
behavior?
National
research shows that schools with traditional honor codes–including
pledge
requirements–have significantly lower rates of academic dishonesty
than schools without
honor codes.
See “Some Good News About Academic Integrity” in the
September/October
2000 issue of
Change Magazine.
In reviewing
the honor pledge concept, the University Senate Committee on Student
Conduct
also found that
pledges generate strong support from graduates of honor code
schools.
Princeton
graduate Don McCabe (Professor of Management at Rutgers University,
and
founder of the
National Center for Academic Integrity at Duke University) wrote the
Committee that:
I am very partial to pledges. I
would suggest that a significant majority of honor code
school alumni. . . can still recite
the honor pledge even though it's been 30- to-50 years
or more since they last signed it.
It was a very meaningful part of the [honor] code
tradition.
This
perspective has been consistently echoed by University of Maryland
faculty members who are graduates of honor code schools.
7.
How can an honor pledge deter someone who has already decided to
engage in academic dishonesty?
Honor
pledges aren’t likely to deter determined cheaters. Most
students, however, do not fall
into that
category. They cheat because they developed the habit of
cheating in high school,
or because
they think "everyone does it" in college. One of the values of
an honor pledge is
regular
reiteration of a campus-wide commitment to academic integrity.
Writing and signing
an honor
pledge–and seeing other students do the same–sends the powerful
message that
academic
dishonesty is not considered acceptable behavior among students,
and that
promoting
academic integrity is a responsibility students share with
faculty members.
8. Why
are students asked to write the Pledge by hand, as well as to
sign it?
The purpose
of asking students to write the Pledge by hand is to promote a
period of serious reflection at the end of an academic exercise.
The few moments required to write the pledge by hand reminds
students that the paper or examination they are submitting is
governed by the ethical rules of a scholarly community.
9. Are
honor pledges burdensome to administer?
Administration of honor pledges is not unduly burdensome, as
evidenced by long-standing faculty support for honor pledges at
many sister institutions. The wording of the Pledge (with
appropriate space to write and sign) is being printed on all
University examination booklets and electronic grading forms.
Faculty
members simply need to explain the pledge requirement on the
first day of class, and remind students to write by hand
and sign the pledge when submitting examinations and
papers. Experience elsewhere and at Maryland indicates that very
few students will neglect to write or sign the pledge. Those who
do should be given an opportunity to comply. Voluntary
participation should be widespread once the pledge becomes an
established custom.
10. What
if a student refuses to write or sign the pledge?
The
Maryland Honor Pledge was reviewed by legal counsel, and is
carefully crafted to respect the autonomy of individuals who
might object to a pledge requirement on religious or ideological
grounds. The University Senate resolution on the Honor Pledge
states that "[s]igning or non-signing of the Pledge will not be
considered in grading or judicial procedures."
If a
handwritten Honor Pledge and Pledge signature do not appear on a
paper or examination, faculty members should ask the student
for an explanation. Doing so has the added value of encouraging
teachers and students to discuss the importance of academic
integrity, and the best ways to promote it. Students remain free
to decline to write or sign the Pledge, and should not be
penalized for exercising that right. Students should be
reminded, however, that they are subject to the requirements of
the Code of Academic Integrity, whether or not they write
and sign the Honor Pledge.
11. How
can a pledge be effective if it isn’t compulsory?
The highest
forms of moral development require freedom to choose, influenced by
example and suasion, not compulsion. The Honor Pledge is meant to
reflect a personal commitment. It should spark thought and debate. A
principled decision not to write and sign the
pledge–discussed and explained in an atmosphere of mutual
respect–would likely do more to promote the University’s core value
of academic integrity than ritualistic compliance.
12.
What if a faculty member is opposed to administering the pledge?
The Honor
Pledge was adopted in conformity with the structures of University
governance, after thoughtful debate. Faculty members are urged to
implement the Pledge in good faith, as they would any other properly
adopted University policy. Furthermore, University Senate adoption
of the Maryland Honor Pledge was the culmination of a significant
student movement to promote academic integrity on the College Park
campus. Cooperation with student leaders in this endeavor will
promote a partnership in teaching and learning that can enrich the
entire community.
13. What
kinds of academic exercises should include a Pledge statement?
The University
Senate Committee on Student Conduct, with approval by the Senate
Executive Committee, has urged faculty members to include the Pledge
“on all assignments worth 20% or more of the course grade.” The
Pledge may also be included on lesser assignments.
14. What
should faculty members write about the Pledge in their syllabi?
The following
language may be used as a model:
The University
has a nationally recognized Honor Code, administered by the Student
Honor Council. The Student Honor Council proposed and the University
Senate approved an Honor Pledge. The University of Maryland Honor
Pledge reads:
“I pledge on my
honor that I have not given or received any unauthorized assistance
on this assignment/examination"
Unless you are
specifically advised to the contrary, the Pledge statement should be
handwritten and signed on the front cover of all papers,
projects, or other academic assignments submitted for evaluation in
this course. Students who fail to write and sign the Pledge will be
asked to confer with the instructor.
The Student
Honor Council also encourages faculty members to include a reference
to--and perhaps a web site address for--any professional ethical
codes pertinent to the course (e.g. the “Fundamental Canons” of the
American Society of Mechanical Engineers).
15. What
should faculty members tell students about University academic
integrity standards, and the Honor Pledge?
Substantial
research shows that academic dishonesty is less likely to occur in
classes where students know their teachers care about academic
integrity. Stern lectures or threats of punishment aren’t required.
The best approach is to identify and affirm high community
standards, endorsed by other students. For example, faculty members
might state on the first day of classes that:
The
University has an active Student Honor Council. The Honor Council
sets high standards for academic integrity, and I support its
efforts. Please note in this regard the University Honor Pledge you
will be asked to write and sign on papers and examinations, as
specified in my syllabus. |