|
For Students: Academic
Code of Academic Integrity
Academic Case Resolution Process
Preparing For An Honor Review
What To Expect At An Honor Review
Sanctions For Academic Charges
Filing An Appeal
Frequently Asked Questions
Resources
Official Forms
Code of Academic Integrity
The University is an academic community. Its fundamental purpose is the pursuit of knowledge.
Like all other communities, the University can function properly only if its members adhere
to clearly established goals and values. Essential to the fundamental purpose of the University
is the commitment to the principles of truth and academic honesty. Accordingly, The Code of
Academic Integrity is designed to ensure that the principle of academic honesty is upheld.
While all members of the University share this responsibility, The Code of Academic Integrity
is designed so that special responsibility for upholding the principle of academic honesty lies
with the students.
Review the complete
Code Of Academic Integrity
at the Student Honor Council website.
Academic Case Resolution Process
-- Coming Soon --
Preparing For An Honor Review
-- Coming Soon --
What To Expect At An Honor Review
-- Coming Soon --
Sanctions For Academic Charges
-- Coming Soon --
Filing An Appeal
-- Coming Soon --
Frequently Asked Questions
-
I received a letter from the Office of Student Conduct requesting a preliminary interview.
What is the purpose of this meeting?
If you are requested to schedule a preliminary interview, you have been referred to our office
because you may have violated the Code of Academic Integrity. With your letter, you will find
a copy the allegation. During the preliminary interview, you will meet with a Student Conduct
staff member and be given the opportunity to respond to the allegation(s). The hearing officer
will also provide information about the disciplinary process.
Possible outcomes of Academic Integrity cases include:
- Request for an Honor Review Hearing to determine sanctions;
- Acknowledge responsibility for committing a violation of the Code and accept the standard "XF" sanction;
- Acknowledge responsibilities for committing a violation of the Code, but request an Honor Review for sanctioning purposes only.
-
What happens if I refuse to attend the preliminary interview?
Refusing to attend a preliminary interview means your voice isn't heard in the matter. You also
miss the opportunity to carefully discuss the disciplinary process with a member of the Student
Conduct staff. In addition, your case will most likely be referred to a judicial board for resolution.
In the meantime, our office may place a "block" your student account, this may prevent you from
registering for classes. The block may remain on your account until the case has been resolved and
if necessary sanctions have been completed.
-
Do I need an attorney?
Informal hearings and other proceedings at an educational institution do not follow the same
procedures used in courtrooms. The university does not employ lawyers to "prosecute" students,
or apply the rules of evidence used in civil or criminal trial. Instead, charges are investigated
and resolved in an atmosphere of candor, truthfulness, and civility. You may have an attorney
present if you desire, but you are not required to have an attorney.
In Academic Integrity cases, attorneys may only serve in an advisory role and may not address
the board. When facing serious allegations, however, some students find it helpful to have the
expertise of an attorney in responding to allegations.
Other students seek the assistance of the Student Legal Aid Office located in the Stamp Student
Union. Student Legal Aid is familiar with our process and may prove helpful to you in some
circumstances. This is a free service offered to all University of Maryland students. Student Legal
Aid can be reached at 301.314.7756. A Student Conduct staff member will be happy to provide you
with their brochure during the preliminary interview.
-
What is the difference between a "conference" and a "hearing?"
In Academic Integrity cases, Honor Reviews are convened to hear cases not resolved in the
Preliminary Interview.
Hearings are before a panel normally consisting of three Honor Council members and two faculty
members. The student and the complaining party generally present their case before a panel of
students who render a decision. If a student is found "responsible" for the alleged violation,
the board will impose appropriate sanctions. In accordance with the Code of Academic Integrity,
the normal penalty for an act of academic dishonesty is the grade penalty of "XF" in the course.
The grade is recorded on the academic transcript with the notation, "failure due to academic
dishonesty".
Resources
-- Coming Soon --
Official Forms
Go to the official referral forms here.
|